
Nobody dissociates for the hell of it.
Nobody dissociates to be a pain in the ass to anybody else. (Believe me, dissociation is a much bigger pain in the ass to trauma survivors who dissociate than it is for anybody else— if we had the choice, we’d find a much less fraught way to annoy you.)
Nobody “chooses” dissociation as a coping tool.
Dissociation is a reflex— and, like most reflexes, it exists to keep us away from pain or danger.
Why would we dissociate to avoid pain or danger?
Usually the reason is because we literally had no other way out of that pain or danger.
Dissociation is escape for people who can’t physically escape.
This is what so many people don’t understand— or maybe don’t want to understand— about dissociation: that not everybody can “just leave” a dangerous situation.
Domestic violence victims very often cannot “just leave” a relationship on which they are economically dependent or in which children are a factor.
Victims of spiritual abuse often can’t “just leave” a church or community that is their main or only source of social contact and support.
Children cannot “just leave” a family in which they are being abused or neglected.
Complex trauma survivors who do not know, in the moment, that they are experiencing complex trauma cannot “just leave,” because they don’t yet realize there is anything to escape.
There are dozens of reasons why physical escape from pain or danger is simply not a realistic option for many.
As a result, our nervous system “solves” this “no win” problem by inventing a “back door”— namely, dissociation.
Sometimes that dissociation looks like just “checking out” or “floating away.”
Other times, especially when we need to stay or appear highly “functional,” dissociation looks like a “part” of ourselves coming forward to do what needs to be done in the moment, while the rest of us “loses” the time that part is “out.”
And still other times, dissociation looks like some aspect of our experience, such as our emotions or our memory of specific things, being made inaccessible to us, so we can “function” for a period of time without feeling the “weight” of what’s been dissociatively cordoned off.
There’s no denying that dissociation is an ingenious strategy for “escaping” situations in which there is no practical or physical escape, at least in the short term.
I strongly believe any realistic trauma recovery strategy needs to give dissociation and the “parts” of ourselves that have gotten us though tough moments their due.
Any recovery “strategy” that shames us for dissociating (or shames any other symptom) is not realistic or sustainable. Actual trauma recovery never begins with shame and is never supported by shame.
It is the case that, if we’re serious about taking back our life from complex trauma, we need to make ourselves less vulnerable to dissociation as a symptom— but that is not the same as shaming ourselves for it or making our “parts” disappear.
We need to remember that if we’re reflexively dissociating, that means some part of us is in flashback or otherwise feeling panicked or threatened— and we need to look inside to understand what’s getting triggered and how we can be there for ourselves.
It’s not that dissociation is “bad” or “wrong.” It’s a symptom, and symptoms, while often inconvenient or destructive, are not “bad” or “wrong.”
It’s that we need to take seriously what dissociation is trying to tell us about what’s going on in our nervous and endocrine system right now— and we need to ask intelligent questions about what we need.
This isn’t about “staying present” for its own sake.
This is about committing to not ignoring or abandoning “parts” of ourselves stuck in “trauma time” inside.
Making the inside of our head and heart is always worth the effort— and when and how we dissociate is going to show us where to start with that commitment.









